Why the Republicans can’t win over the Democrats bull shit!

EVERY AMERICAN NEEDS TO READ THIS ARTICLE..Unfortunately those who should read it are not going to so I would suggest that you who have, should force feed this information to every A hole you can find..
Take a moment to digest this provocative article by a Jewish Rabbi from Teaneck , N.J. It is far and away the most succinct and thoughtful explanation of how our nation is changing. The article appeared in The Israel National News, and is directed to Jewish readership. 70% of American Jews vote as Democrats. The Rabbi has some interesting comments in that regard.

Rabbi Steven Pruzansky is the spiritual leader of Congregation Bnai Yeshurun in Teaneck, New Jersey
“The most charitable way of explaining the election results of 2012 is that Americans voted for the status quo – for the incumbent President and for a divided Congress. They must enjoy gridlock, partisanship, incompetence, economic stagnation and avoidance of responsibility. And fewer people voted.
But as we awake from the nightmare, it is important to eschew the facile explanations for the Romney defeat that will prevail among the chattering classes. Romney did not lose because of the effects of Hurricane Sandy that devastated this area, nor did he lose because he ran a poor campaign, nor did he lose because the Republicans could have chosen better candidates, nor did he lose because Obama benefited from a slight uptick in the economy due to the business cycle.

Romney lost because he didn’t get enough votes to win.

That might seem obvious, but not for the obvious reasons. Romney lost because the conservative virtues – the traditional American virtues – of liberty, hard work, free enterprise, private initiative and aspirations to moral greatness – no longer inspire or animate a majority of the electorate.

The simplest reason why Romney lost was because it is impossible to compete against free stuff.

Every businessman knows this; that is why the “loss leader” or the giveaway is such a powerful marketing tool. Obama’s America is one in which free stuff is given away: the adults among the 47,000,000 on food stamps clearly recognized for whom they should vote, and so they did, by the tens of millions; those who – courtesy of Obama – receive two full years of unemployment benefits (which, of course, both disincentives looking for work and also motivates people to work off the books while collecting their windfall) surely know for whom to vote. The lure of free stuff is irresistible.

The defining moment of the whole campaign was the revelation of the secretly-recorded video in which Romney acknowledged the difficulty of winning an election in which “47% of the people” start off against him because they pay no taxes and just receive money – “free stuff” – from the government.

Almost half of the population has no skin in the game – they don’t care about high taxes, promoting business, or creating jobs, nor do they care that the money for their free stuff is being borrowed from their children and from the Chinese.

They just want the free stuff that comes their way at someone else’s expense. In the end, that 47% leaves very little margin for error for any Republican, and does not bode well for the future.

It is impossible to imagine a conservative candidate winning against such overwhelming odds. People do vote their pocketbooks. In essence, the people vote for a Congress who will not raise their taxes, and for a President who will give them free stuff, never mind who has to pay for it.

That engenders the second reason why Romney lost: the inescapable conclusion that the electorate is ignorant and uninformed. Indeed, it does not pay to be an informed voter, because most other voters – the clear majority – are unintelligent and easily swayed by emotion and raw populism. That is the indelicate way of saying that too many people vote with their hearts and not their heads. That is why Obama did not have to produce a second term agenda, or even defend his first-term record. He needed only to portray Mitt Romney as a rapacious capitalist who throws elderly women over a cliff, when he is not just snatching away their cancer medication, while starving the poor and cutting taxes for the rich.

During his 1956 presidential campaign, a woman called out to Adlai Stevenson: “Senator, you have the vote of every thinking person!” Stevenson called back: “That’s not enough, madam, we need a majority!” Truer words were never spoken.

Obama could get away with saying that “Romney wants the rich to play by a different set of rules” – without ever defining what those different rules were; with saying that the “rich should pay their fair share” – without ever defining what a “fair share” is; with saying that Romney wants the poor, elderly and sick to “fend for themselves” – without even acknowledging that all these government programs are going bankrupt, their current insolvency only papered over by deficit spending.

Similarly, Obama (or his surrogates) could hint to blacks that a Romney victory would lead them back into chains and proclaim to women that their abortions and birth control would be taken away. He could appeal to Hispanics that Romney would have them all arrested and shipped to Mexico and unabashedly state that he will not enforce the current immigration laws. He could espouse the furtherance of the incestuous relationship between governments and unions – in which politicians ply the unions with public money, in exchange for which the unions provide the politicians with votes, in exchange for which the politicians provide more money and the unions provide more votes, etc., even though the money is gone.

Obama also knows that the electorate has changed – that whites will soon be a minority in America (they’re already a minority in California) and that the new immigrants to the US are primarily from the Third World and do not share the traditional American values that attracted immigrants in the 19th and 20th centuries. It is a different world, and a different America . Obama is part of that different America , knows it, and knows how to tap into it. That is why he won.

Obama also proved again that negative advertising works, invective sells, and harsh personal attacks succeed. That Romney never engaged in such diatribes points to his essential goodness as a person; his “negative ads” were simple facts, never personal abuse – facts about high unemployment, lower take-home pay, a loss of American power and prestige abroad, a lack of leadership, etc. As a politician, though, Romney failed because he did not embrace the devil’s bargain of making unsustainable promises.

It turned out that it was not possible for Romney and Ryan – people of substance, depth and ideas – to compete with the shallow populism and platitudes of their opponents. Obama mastered the politics of envy – of class warfare – never reaching out to Americans as such but to individual groups, and cobbling together a winning majority from these minority groups. If an Obama could not be defeated – with his record and his vision of America , in which free stuff seduces voters – it is hard to envision any change in the future.

The road to Hillary Clinton in 2016 and to a European-socialist economy – those very economies that are collapsing today in Europe – is paved.

For Jews, mostly assimilated anyway and staunch Democrats, the results demonstrate again that liberalism is their Torah. Almost 70% voted for a president widely perceived by Israelis and most committed Jews as hostile to Israel . They voted to secure Obama’s future at America ‘s expense and at Israel ‘s expense – in effect, preferring Obama to Netanyahu by a wide margin.

A dangerous time is ahead. Under present circumstances, it is inconceivable that the US will take any aggressive action against Iran and will more likely thwart any Israeli initiative. The US will preach the importance of negotiations up until the production of the first Iranian nuclear weapon – and then state that the world must learn to live with this new reality.

But this election should be a wake-up call to Jews. There is no permanent empire, nor is there an enduring haven for Jews anywhere in the exile. The American empire began to decline in 2007, and the deterioration has been exacerbated in the last five years. This election only hastens that decline.

Society is permeated with sloth, greed, envy and materialistic excess. It has lost its moorings and its moral foundations.. The takers outnumber the givers, and that will only increase in years to come.

The “Occupy” riots across this country in the last two years were mere dress rehearsals for what lies ahead – years of unrest sparked by the increasing discontent of the unsuccessful who want to seize the fruits and the bounty of the successful, and do not appreciate the slow pace of redistribution.

If this election proves one thing, it is that the Old America is gone. And, sad for the world, it is not coming back.”

The problems we face today are there because the people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living.



Last week a young black man was arrested by the Baltimore, Md police department.  He was put into a van and when he arrived at HQ’s he was so sick that he was rushed to a hospital.  He died and this act of possible indifference created a stupid situation that caused black people pain, suffering, loss of what ever strength they had achieved over the past decade.  We all saw the hundreds of brats scurrying over the west side of Baltimore, smashing, looting and burning everything they could see.  The little blind bastards destroyed their own neighborhoods and couldn’t care less.  Today, 24 hours after this crap, several of the youths broke into a local shoe store and were carting out boxes of those famous sneakers that are endorsed by their own potential heroes.  The police were on them in a flash and as they were being arrested and taken away, the remaining children jeered and booed the cops.  What kind of shit is this?

The news media are just having a ball with this.  It reminds me of the weather people during this winter. They couldn’t be happier than telling everyone how bad the snow was.  I heard POTUS in his slow, cool hand Luke way that oh shucks, things shouldn’t have gone this way and that only a few rotten apples were the instigators.

He and his partners in crime say that  these kids need to get out of poverty and learn more and have fathers who care and can lead them.  This bullshit  has been said every time there is any incident that involves the black community.  The politicians have been using this ploy for decades, ever since Johnson and the great society.  The trillions of dollars that have been thrown at “poverty” seems to end up in the politicians pockets. Then another piece goes to the Sharpton’s and Jackson’s  who seem to sing their way into the hearts and minds of their faithful.  Some more goes to the teachers who can’t seem to get a handle on the minds of these malcontents.  I could go on and on but to what end.  No one believes what they see.  It’s all in the eyes of the beholders. At the end of his “talk”, Obama said well heck, it was only one fire in a big town.  The schmuck didn’t even check to find out that there were fires not only in West Baltimore, but East Baltimore as well.

The mayor of Baltimore was little to no help.  She told the  police commissioner to hold back and let the marauders run free so as to not hurt her chances of getting re-elected.  Oh I already said that the politicians had their hands out, didn’t I.  Sorry about that,  trickle down means something else when it comes to governments piece of the action.

So what’s the answer, more of our money thrown to the dogs?  Possibly allowing the one per-centers to invest in businesses that don’t need workers with skills.  Open up schools that teach trades and have  retired contractors and plumbers and electricians to teach.   Stop taxing corporations and businesses so they will invest in communities.  Make sure that the police are equipped to handle situations and make damn sure that supervisors are promoted because they are qualified to lead not due to some human rights equal opportunity bull.

The Supreme Court is contemplating the gay marriage situation.  Maybe gay’s should have the kids, at least they will have a “mom and dad” to raise and nurture them.  The social geniuses should work out a scheme whereby if the mother of a child born into poverty can’t get her act together, that child would be fostered out to a gay family.  This way everyone wins even the father who had to leave his family because the welfare checks would stop if he stayed around.  Great idea, that!  ” I’m sorry sir, but if you remain in the household we will not support you too.”

Recently I heard that food stamps provide about two dollars and fifty cents for a meal per family member.  Interestingly enough that is the amount paid to illegals along with a host of other goodies that should be allocated for American citizens.  Another billion or so that would certainly help.   If they stopped building basketball courts and build teen centers with indoor pools and computers and maybe even a auto shop and a foundry,  etc. etc.  Oh well they would probably burn it down as well.

Obama doesn’t hate the United States.

As far as I can determine, Obama doesn’t hate The United States, he hates Imperialism.  His wife is the hater.  She has said as much on TV and in the press.  She does love her trips around the world and her fabulous meals and extraordinary spending sprees.  Unfortunately her wardrobes, as expensive as they may be don’t seem to make her attractive, despite what the fawning left press and fashion world insist on drumming into the heads of the naive populace who grovel at the feet of the First Family.

I initially said POTUS doesn’t necessarily hate the United States and this is evident in what he has done in the past.  If you remember shortly after taking office one of the first things he did was to send back the bust of Winston Churchill. Winny was a Imperialist and for those of you who are not sure what an imperialist is allow me to define it

The policy of extending the rule or authority of an empire or nation over foreign countries, or of acquiring and holding colonies and dependencies.

Advocacy of imperial or sovereign interests over the interests of the dependent states.

Imperial government; rule by an emperor or empress.

British. the policy of so uniting the separate parts of an empire with separate governments as to secure for certain purposes a single state.

Look at the definition above and tell me what Obama hates. The policy of uniting separate parts of the British Empire as to secure a single state.  Sounds like something every nation has done over the millennium.  How does one protect the people of a nation without a central power?  That power to defend the nation from the barbarians that would invade and conquer her. So since, he wants to open the floodgates to everyone who would invade this country, He hates that idea.

Advocacy of imperial or sovereign interests over the interests of the dependent states.  That may be problematic.  We fought against this part of the definition of Imperialism in 1776.  That is a long time ago to hold a grudge against the British. Not as long as the Muslims have held a grudge against Christians though.

Ah, the Imperial government; rule by an emperor or empress.  Our golfing President loves the power he has granted himself by administrative directives, bypassing the legal methods written in the Constitution of the United States to protect us from dictatorship.  A most interesting word, dictator.

A person exercising absolute power, especially a ruler who has absolute, unrestricted control in a government without hereditary succession.

Does that fit into what he has been doing for the last 6 years, and what he will continue to do over the next two?

Again, let me say that what we can expect from a man who was born into a socialist family with the continual spewing of left wing diatribes about the evil empires that have caused nothing but pain and suffering to the people of the world.  This trumpery continued to follow him throughout his formative years.  Growing up in an environment full of anti-imperialist rhetoric from not only family but by his own words, religionists and comrades who bolstered and inculcated his mind and character to what he believes in today.

Is there any doubt that this man would seek a complete overthrow of our way of life?  His obsession has always been socialism.  From ivy covered bastions of left wing thinking, where Communist inspired thought police have completely used him and who have surrounded him people with the same malefic mindset that has brought us to our present state of affairs.  This government is immobilized and both parties have failed the citizens of this once great country.  Can we take control again, reduce the corruption of our constitution, and drive out the reversals to our nation’s heritage?

If we give a damn about our future, your children’s future, pay attention and stand up, write emails, text and speak out especially in the schools and church group meetings. Don’t stop, because as God is my judge, we will not be free.


Army Sergeant Release Continues To Be A Manchurian Candidate

This guy just doesn’t look right to me.


 Although I am happy for his family and friends, I want more answers from Army Sgt., Bowe Bergdahl who is  recovering from his  five years desertion from the United States.  POTUS can say what a great job he is doing getting our boys back from the terrible Taliban, even faster than he promised.

Bergdahl, 28,  snuck  away from his platoon’s small outpost in Afghanistan’s Paktika province on June 30, 2009, after growing  disenchanted with the U.S. military’s war effort. Wow what a guy!  Sounds like he should have worked with Obama on the streets as community organizers.  This would have played right in to their socialist dreams.

Well the schmuck  was captured shortly afterward by enemy forces and held captive in Pakistan by insurgents affiliated with the Taliban.  I wonder how he was treated during this time.  I would perceive that the Taliban knew he was coming. If half the Amy knew he was dissatisfied  what says he did’n t let them know he wanted to help them with their propaganda. Not only did he desert,  an entire U.S. military division and thousands of Afghan soldiers and police devoted weeks to searching for him, and some soldiers resented risking their lives for someone they considered a deserter.

Bergdahl was recovered Saturday by a U.S. Special Operations team in Afghanistan after weeks of intense negotiations in which U.S. officials, working through the government of Qatar, played a hand in yet another white wash of the administration.  The news was hailed by President Barack Obama on Saturday as a sign of Washington’s “ironclad commitment to bring our prisoners of war home.” But the reaction from current and former U.S. service members was decidedly more mixed. Some said that although they were glad to see Bergdahl freed, he must be held accountable for his choices.  This weak sister Special Operations team actually had the audacity to say that this  prisoner swap with the Taliban was  a good thing for the US.  We exchanged  five Taliban commanders from captivity at the military detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

Bergdahl will not be prosecuted by the Army and will be given a hero’s welcome.  Disappearing from a military post in a war zone without authorization commonly results in one of two criminal charges in the Army: desertion or going absent without leave, or AWOL. Desertion is the more serious one, and usually arises in cases where an individual intends to remain away from the military or to “shirk important duty,” including a combat deployment such as Bergdahl’s.

Obama keeps sticking the knife into our backs.  This is just another ploy to undermine the US Constitution and our rights.  HE DID NOT SEEK FEEDBACK FROM THE CONGRESS!!!! That is required for this action.  His response, there wasn’t enough time in order to make the swap.  Any Congressman worth his salt should be up in arms about this executive action.  YOU my friend should be up in arms with your Congressmen who failed to restrain this usurper.

Javier Ortiz, a former combat medic in the Army, said he is frustrated with Bergdahl’s actions and thinks he should be tried for desertion, even after five years in captivity in Pakistan. Many U.S. troops had misgivings about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan while they were deployed but did not act on it as Bergdahl did, said Ortiz, of Lawton, Oklahoma.

“I had a responsibility while I was there to the guys I was with, and that’s why this hits the hardest,” said Ortiz, who was in Iraq from March 2003 to March 2004 with the 101st Airborne Division. “Regardless of what you learned while being there, we still have a responsibility to the men to our left and right. It’s terrible, what he did.”

But U.S. troops said they were aware of the circumstances of Bergdahl’s disappearance – that he left the base of his own volition – and with that awareness, many grew angry. “The unit completely changed its operational posture because of something that was selfish, not because a solider was captured in combat,” said one U.S. soldier formerly based in Afghanistan who spoke on the condition of anonymity. “There were military assets required … but the problem came of his own accord.”

The search in Paktika was eventually called off, after U.S. officials acknowledged that Bergdahl had been taken to Pakistan. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel,  Another White House flunky , speaking Sunday in Bagram, Afghanistan, declined to talk about any possible action by the military against Bergdahl. A senior defense official indicated that punitive action was unlikely. Of course it would be unlikely,  POTUS has delivered to the terrorists another soldier in the war against the United States.

Chances are you haven’t heard of the six soldiers who died hunting for him after he went missing, according to military officials.



Sicko targets girl

THE HEAD of a city program for kids was busted for exposing himself to an 11 year old girl as she walked to school in Harlem.

It appears that no one is immune to the depravity of people who are held in the highest regards by all of us.  What can we do to stop this crap, other than taking the law into our own hands.  Well you know where that leads us.  Anyway this jerk was described as a well-dressed professional and has a young son who stays with him on weekends.  Neighbors say they will be more cautious in the future….Well that’s great, but what do you have to have happen before its too late.   The super in his building said the guy always said “Hi.”  Jeez that sure makes it okay, right?  This is like all the neighbors and friends of convicted killers who always tell you what a great guy this guy or another was and how he was a A student and more bullshit…..I wish I had a taser or stun gun I could give kids, but that’s not going to work.